Skip to main content

David La Point versus Z-Technology s.r.o

As a pioneer in the field of frequency technology, as reported by other writers about my person, I do not want to deprive you of the current dispute between David La Point and Z-Technology s.r.o.. Below you will find the statement from Z-Technology, with whom I have been familiar for a long time and whose products I have always endorsed.

Statement from Z-Technology s.r.o

On the website primerfieldfoundation.org you can read a very surprising change in David La Point's behaviour. We must react to these often completely false words.

The great disappointment that Mr La Point has caused our company has led to a strong protest against his statements about our PrimerCube. Here are the most important points so far :

  1. Our PrimerCube is absolutely SAFE - it has been tested in an independent multinational laboratory that issues certificates for the whole world and has numerous internationally recognised certificates that allow the measurement of a wide range of properties of new products launched on the world market.
  2. the magnetic shell inside our PrimerCube is made to David La Point's exact specifications, although we already have much better and more effective shells that we are currently testing with excellent results. The blueprints for the bowl and the entire PrimerCube were until recently available for free download at primerfieldfoundation ( opern source ) and we have used them with permission from David La Point to build his "original" (for comparison purposes) and to develop our own, more modern PrimerCube.
  3. david La Point received our first sample of the PrimerCube in 2020 and measured the magnetic field generated by our PrimerCube. He described it as identical to that of his PrimerCube (see. Newsletter PrimerFieldFoundation from 17 May 2021)
  4. the 4-year sales results of our PrimerCube are THE SAME as those of David La Point's PrimerCube (! ! ! ) The extremely positive reactions of our customers put us in a completely different light than David La Point claims.
  5. when a new investor promised David La Point a lot, he suddenly withdrew his support and began to slander us. In the civilised world, this is known as unfair commercial competition . We are in the process of clarifying this issue with our law firm.
  6. the recent disappearance of the open source product PrimerCube from La Point's website confirms our suspicions, which have been constantly repeated by David La Point: the entry of a new investor puts an end to the concept of "prioritising people and health over profits".
  7. the design of PrimerCube and the actions of David La Point are, as he says, guided by God. His statement left us very perplexed... He said that God had shown him a cube and that he had built it according to his instructions. Four years ago, in an interview for an article about the primer cube in New Regena magazine, he told us that he had discovered the healing properties of the magnetic dish while servicing one of his fusion facilities.
  8. we have a lot of experience with the instruments that we manufacture. We always test their effect for one to two years before we launch them on the world market. Only with PrimerCube did we rely on David La Point's presentation on the benefits of using the PrimerCube and test it for only six months before offering it to the public. However, the reactions of our testers and later our customers have confirmed that the Czech PrimerCube has at least the same effect as La Point's PrimerCube. The current defamation of our PrimerCube by David La Point is both ridiculous and sad. We could not believe that he would stoop to such petty behaviour.
  9. in the civilised world, the termination of a collaboration is done by agreement between the parties involved, not by hysterical shouting on the internet. We would have no problem understanding this. But Mr La Point has once again shown us what money can do to people. The reason for all this is clear: he wants a monopoly on the production of PrimerCube, which is very complicated after the release and subsequent withdrawal from open source. Another possibility - also hinted at by the withdrawal from the open source - is that PrimerCube disappears into the vault. Mr La Point has no idea, but we have found this to be the case in our practice . We were very close to a similar case.
  10. mr La Point refused twice to visit us personally in the USA with our first sample of PrimerCube. We don't know why. He said he was very busy... We know all the people we work with personally and the co-operation has always been successful, with the exception of David La Point. This fact speaks volumes.
  11. Anyone who is a little tech savvy will realise that what works in the PrimerCube and provides the benefits described is the shell that supports the relatively strong neodymium magnets. We will never say that our PrimerCube is the best and the others are bad - because we know that almost anyone can build a bowl with magnets, it is not difficult. The rotating bowl with magnets is what works in the PrimerCube. Not the motor, not the bearings, not the screen, not the rounded corners of the plastic housing, not the design of the cube (! ). David LaPoint himself confirmed this to us in one of his many emails.
  12. Our company does not belong to the amateurs, in the course of our activity we have created several unique devices that have no competition worldwide. We have been on the market since 2003, i.e. for more than 20 years, and our instruments are frequently used in renowned laboratories around the world. In the course of our work, we have come to know various experts, but also "experts". Two of our closest colleagues have visions similar to those of Nikola Tesla, for example: they "see" the solution immediately when they are given an assignment. One is an engineer and heads our development laboratory, the other is a chemist and has no training in this field, but both ALWAYS have a "visionary" solution that advances the current state of knowledge. We utilise their talents with their unreserved approval. However, neither of them refer to these visions as God or explain them in any other supernatural way. Both are engineers and know that our world is governed by the laws of physics . For example, they make it clear that the "rounded plastic corners of the PrimerCube" and the design of our motor cannot influence the magnetic field emanating from the rotating bowl in any way. The direction of rotation of the bowl is also irrelevant according to this view - in relation to the cardinal points and the rotation of our planet.
  13. The motor that drives our PrimerCube is customised for our company. It was developed by the manufacturer taking into account our requirement not to affect the magnetic field of the dish it transports and to be as quiet as possible. Our motor runs according to this specification. What Mr La Point writes about our motor is stupid, absurd and unprofessional
  14. We don't want to be associated with La Point anymore. We are a company that has been making excellent instruments for over 20 years and we are no strangers to the use of phantom instruments and complacency towards our God. This "evidence" has been used in the past by the Inquisition.

We are preparing a detailed description of what has happened in the nearly five years of co-operation with La Point.

Team Z-Technology s.r.o. European Union